In this autumn, coffee Psychomot did in novelty installed the "blue stones at night," the new place that we opened, the evening was led from the cocktail of three papers presented by participants and followed by an exchange time.
Focused on the work of psychomotor, 1 (A BROWN presented by P OLIVIER, dealt with the transition from sensation to emotion in the relationship through emotional tuning, 2 nd (O Moyano presented by B YESTE ) on the modality of relationship involved in working with patients under the meaning of the psychomotor, 3 rd (G PONTOON presented by GOAT BRETON V) about the relationship with the patient dying.
By weaving a thread between these texts, it is clear from discussions that the issue of the relationship is one that arouses the most exchanges, as the practices, concepts, theories vary. However, everyone seemed in agreement on this common ground that the relationship with the patient based on a tuning range of affect, an implication relation, a physical engagement and concept of psychomotor as malleable medium.
This tuning affects, this double mirror, one assumes there to reflect, to feel, to mimic the patient in the same way, same as him?
Adjusting from his feelings is to accept to join the other without understanding what is happening, but not just imitate, do as the other, the risk of being wrong. That might be let to experience, express in a different sensory modality as that used by the patient, the specificity Psychomot without always understanding what is happening and without necessarily wanting at all costs: to be present to the other.
How surprised without any control, while supporting the repetition and length of follow-up?
And then what is the posture of the patient with psychomotor: is it works or goes down? When and how to intervene without breaking, which is found in all diseases where the boundary question arises as well as in end of life?
According to the text of O Moyano, psychomotor not part of the rehearsal but would have more appeal, from the real body, to functions that do not develop, which have not occurred; this would be rather to acquire, develop them. He challenged the transfer in psychomotor and thought it would be more about working an emotional relationship and effective organization of the body, space and ego.
During the discussion, the proposal of O Moyano has been questioned. It appears in any case necessary to place it in its theoretical and historical context, (and references to Ali Sami Flagey). For some it was too neuropsychological, under a design in psychomotor disorder which would reveal or repeat a disruption of the harmonious development of the subject and that implies a relationship to psychomotor which reproduces the relationship with parents (representatives), in reference to psychoanalysis.
In the work, is he or not to reconvene the failure of a past relationship, reliving a past experience?
And the population to which she addressed the impact on our conceptions of work? The last
specific text accompanying the end of life, the prospect of death as a reality principle, showcasing the work of psychomotor in accompanying the transition from life to death and not a decrease in disorder in itself. In these practices that affect us all in our position of human, personal and intimate design of the death did not influence does not approach the patient?
The text of G dock, which includes humans in the cosmos, the universe and continuity between the before and after life on earth might have appeared to some esoteric, sometimes ideal. Others who knew the clinic, expressed specificity of this work compared to other clinics and especially the fundamental support of teamwork that makes it easier to be there, present in the here and now to patients.
In the opinion of all, the time for debate about the texts was too short. We will consider in the next coffee Psychomot February 9, 2010.
However, the blog allows you to speak again and to share your feedback, we hope that many.
Christine CORSINI for ARRCP
0 comments:
Post a Comment